ClawEngine.ai

Compare

Zyte alternatives: 11 web scraping APIs compared, and where the Zyte API still wins

The short answer

Zyte is the commercial company behind Scrapy, and the Zyte API bundles proxy unblocking, browser rendering and AI extraction behind one endpoint that bills per successful request. Teams look for a Zyte alternative for two reasons: the per-request price depends on which of five difficulty tiers your target sites fall into, so the monthly bill is hard to forecast before you run the crawl, and automatic extraction is built around a fixed list of page types rather than a schema you declare. ClawEngine crawls from a seed URL, renders each page and fills your own schema in one call, on flat plans from $39 a month. Zyte keeps a real advantage on heavily defended sites, and we will not pretend otherwise.

Zyte is not a startup and it should not be judged like one. The company was Scrapinghub before it was Zyte, it created Scrapy and still maintains it, and it has been running crawls for enterprise customers for well over a decade. That history shows up in the product. Zyte API is one endpoint that picks between datacenter and residential proxies, decides whether a page needs a browser, retries what fails, and bills you only for responses that succeeded. Rate-limited requests cost nothing. Standard plans get 3,000 requests per minute. On a site that fights back, this is a serious piece of infrastructure and there is no honest version of this page that says otherwise.

What sends teams looking is usually not reliability. It is two other things. The first is forecasting: Zyte prices every request by which of five difficulty tiers the target site sits in, separately for HTTP and browser requests, so the same 100,000 pages can cost wildly different amounts depending on where you point the crawler. That is arguably the fairest way to price unblocking, and it is still hard to put in a budget before you have run the crawl. The second is the shape of the output. Automatic extraction is excellent on the page types Zyte models, and awkward the moment your target is not one of them. ClawEngine takes the opposite trade: flat monthly plans sized by page volume, and a schema you declare yourself that gets filled from the rendered page in the same call that crawled it. We work on public, permitted pages only, we respect robots.txt, site Terms of Service and crawl-delay, and we do not defeat anti-bot systems. If your crawl depends on getting past active blocking, Zyte is the better purchase and you should make it.

Crawl · render JS · extract typed fields · robots.txt respected

Extraction demo
POST
Try:

Hit Extract to turn this page into clean, LLM-ready data.

robots.txt respected · public data only ·

Markdown · JSON · structured fields, from one API call. Crawling, rendering and extracting ... Samples are recorded. Your own URL is crawled live.

Zyte is the stronger choice when your targets actively block crawlers and you need proxy and unblocking depth behind a Python spider stack, while ClawEngine is the better fit when your targets are public and permitted and you want a forecastable monthly bill with typed fields you defined yourself.

All the options

11 Zyte alternatives, compared

Published US list prices, checked in September 2026. We include ourselves, and we say where each tool beats us.

Swipe to compare all columns →

Alternative Starts at Free tier Output Best for
ClawEngine $39/mo No free plan Clean markdown or typed JSON Teams that want one compliance-first pipeline returning LLM-ready data for RAG and agents
Firecrawl $16/mo Yes, 1,000 credits a month Clean markdown, plus structured extraction Fast site-to-markdown for LLM workflows, and teams that want the option to self-host
Bright Data Usage-based 5,000 records or requests a month per product JSON and datasets, not markdown-first Enterprise-scale proxy networks and prebuilt datasets for hard, heavily defended targets
Apify $19/mo Yes, $5 credits JSON, CSV and dataset exports Teams that want a prebuilt scraper for a specific site rather than building one
ScrapingBee $19/mo 1,000 free API credits, no card Raw HTML, with some extraction rules Simple proxy plus JavaScript rendering behind a clean REST API
ScraperAPI $49/mo 1,000 credits a month, plus a 7-day 5,000-credit trial Raw HTML, with structured endpoints for some sites High-volume proxy rotation at a low cost per request
ZenRows $16/mo Yes, 5,000 credits a month HTML, with markdown and parsing options Sites behind aggressive anti-bot systems
Oxylabs $49/mo Trial, up to 2,000 results HTML, JSON via parsers, and markdown Enterprises pulling high volumes from hard, well-known targets like major marketplaces
Crawl4AI Free, open source Yes, fully open source Markdown, Fit Markdown, or JSON for embedding Engineering teams happy to run and maintain the infrastructure themselves
Diffbot $299/mo Yes, 10,000 credits a month Structured JSON entities, plus a Knowledge Graph Enterprises that need web-wide entity intelligence and rule-less extraction across many different site layouts
ScrapeGraphAI $20/mo Yes, 500 credits Structured JSON from a natural-language prompt or schema, plus markdown Teams that want LLM-driven extraction from a plain-English prompt, or an MIT-licensed Python library they can run themselves

ClawEngine

Hobby $39, Startup $99, Scale $399, Enterprise custom

Where it wins. Crawl, JavaScript rendering and typed schema extraction happen in a single API call, and robots.txt plus site Terms of Service are respected by default.

What to watch. There is no free plan, so it is priced for teams running real pipelines rather than one-off experiments.

Firecrawl

Free 1,000 credits a month (2 concurrent), Hobby $16 (5k credits, 5 concurrent), Standard $83 (100k, 25), Growth $333 (500k, 50), Scale $599 (1M, 100), Enterprise by quote. Prices shown are the billed-yearly rate; billed monthly, Hobby is $19, Standard $99 and Growth $399

Where it wins. Excellent developer experience, a well-loved open-source project, and markdown output tuned for token efficiency.

What to watch. The headline 1 credit a page is the plain scrape only. Asking for structured JSON adds 4 credits, so a page you want back as typed fields is 5 credits, which turns Standard from $0.83 into $4.15 per 1,000 pages. PDF parsing adds 1 credit a PDF page, a prompt injection check adds 4, zero data retention adds 1, Map is 1 credit a call, Search is 2 per 10 results, and Interact is 2 to 7 credits a browser minute. A page that comes back as a 403 or 404 still costs 1 credit; only a request that returns no document at all is free. Plan credits do not roll over except on annual Scale, and pay-as-you-go top-ups run $5.00 per 1,000 extra credits on Hobby, $2.50 on Standard, $2.00 on Growth and $1.00 on Scale, up to three times the in-plan rate.

Bright Data

Web Scraper API billed per record: free tier 5,000 records a month, pay-as-you-go $1.50 per 1,000, Scale $499 a month for 384,000 records then $1.30 per 1,000, Enterprise by quote. You pay only for successful deliveries. Web Unlocker and SERP API use the same $1.50 and $1.30 rates per 1,000 requests, while the Browser API is metered by bandwidth at $8 per GB pay-as-you-go

Where it wins. The largest proxy network in the category (150M+ residential IPs across 195 countries) and hundreds of prebuilt domain scrapers and ready-made datasets.

What to watch. It is a broad platform rather than a single LLM-ready endpoint, so output usually needs cleaning before you can embed it, and the pricing surface is complex: each product has its own meter (records, requests or gigabytes), plans carry a minimum monthly commitment billed from the 1st, and unused plan volume does not roll over.

Apify

Free ($5 usage), Starter $19, Scale $199, Business $999 billed monthly (about 10 percent less billed annually), each including that dollar value of usage. Actor compute is billed per compute unit at $0.20 (Free and Starter), $0.16 (Scale) or $0.13 (Business), with proxies charged on top

Where it wins. A marketplace of thousands of prebuilt Actors, so common targets are already solved, plus a full automation and scheduling platform.

What to watch. Costs stack in layers: the plan buys a dollar allowance, Actor compute burns it at $0.13 to $0.20 per compute unit, and residential proxies add $7 to $8 per GB on top. Unused allowance expires monthly, and output is generic JSON rather than LLM-ready markdown.

ScrapingBee

Hobby $19 (75k credits, 25 concurrent), Freelance $49 (250k, 50), Startup $99 (1M, 100), Business $249 (3M, 200), Business+ $599 (8M, 400), then Enterprise plans by quote with higher concurrency

Where it wins. Very easy to adopt, dependable rendering, and a Google Search API bundled into every tier.

What to watch. JavaScript rendering is on by default and costs 5 credits, so a Freelance plan is 50,000 rendered pages rather than the 250,000 the credit count suggests. Premium proxy is 10 credits alone or 25 with rendering, and stealth proxy is 75. Responses with a 200, 404 or 410 status are billed. You also mostly get HTML back, so the cleaning, chunking and structuring work for an LLM is still yours to do.

ScraperAPI

Free plan 1,000 credits at 5 threads, plus a 7-day trial of 5,000. Hobby $49 (100k credits, 20 threads), Startup $149 (1M, 50), Business $299 (3M, 100), Scaling $475 (5M, 200), Professional $975 (10.5M, 300), Advanced $1,975 (21.5M, 500), Enterprise by quote above 22M. Annual billing takes 10 percent off every tier

Where it wins. Strong price per request at volume and a very simple drop-in proxy API.

What to watch. The multipliers decide the bill: a plain request is 1 credit, render 10, premium 10, screenshot 10, premium with render 25, ultra premium 30 and ultra premium with render 75, while Amazon, Walmart and eBay cost 5, Google and Bing 25 and LinkedIn 30, and clearing Cloudflare, DataDome or PerimeterX adds 10. Two policies matter more than the rates: credits do not roll over, and pay-as-you-go overage is available only on Scaling and above, so hitting 100 percent on Hobby, Startup or Business stops the pipeline until you upgrade. Only 200 and 404 responses are billed. It is proxy infrastructure first, so an LLM pipeline still needs its own parsing, boilerplate stripping and schema layer.

ZenRows

Free tier (5,000 credits a month, 5 concurrent), Build $16 (45,000 credits, 20 concurrent), Launch $57 (250,000, 50), Growth $165 (1.2M, 100), Scale $456 (5M, 200), Enterprise custom (400 to 1000+ concurrent). Prices shown are the billed-yearly rate; billed monthly they are $19, $69, $199 and $549

Where it wins. Focused on getting through Cloudflare, DataDome and PerimeterX where simpler fetchers fail.

What to watch. The multipliers set the real price, not the headline credit count: a plain fetch is 1 credit, a JavaScript-rendered page is 5, premium proxies are 10, and premium with rendering is 25, which is the ceiling. Residential bandwidth is billed at a flat 25,000 credits per GB, and Browser Sessions add 5 credits a minute on top of bandwidth. Launch at $57 therefore buys about 50,000 rendered pages. Failed requests are not charged, but 404 and 410 responses count as successful. You also get HTML back, so the cleaning and structuring work for an LLM is still yours.

Oxylabs

Web Scraper API: free trial up to 2,000 results, Micro $49 (up to 98,000), Starter $99 (up to 220,000), Advanced $249 (up to 622,500), Business $999 (up to 3,330,000), Custom by quote. Residential proxies are a separate purchase: $30/5GB, $100/20GB, $500/125GB, $2,500/1TB, which is $6.00 down to $2.50 per GB

Where it wins. Enterprise-grade unblocking, a large global proxy network, and dedicated parsers for major targets, plus a free Custom Parser for your own CSS or XPath rules.

What to watch. Two rules move the real bill. First, rates are set by target category, roughly $0.25 to $0.50 per 1,000 for Amazon, $0.50 to $1.00 for Google, $0.70 to $1.15 for other sources and $0.95 to $1.35 with JavaScript rendering, and the headline result count is quoted against the cheapest one. Oxylabs own maximum-results table shows the same free trial buying 2,000 Amazon results but only 769 JavaScript-rendered results from an ordinary site, a 2.6 times spread that carries up the whole ladder. Second, the billing documentation counts any 2xx or 4xx response as a successful result, so a 404 on a dead link or a 403 from a site that blocked you is billed at full rate. Whole-site crawling means buying a second product.

Crawl4AI

Apache-2.0, no license cost. You pay for your own servers, proxies and engineering time. A hosted Cloud API is in closed beta with no public pricing

Where it wins. No vendor bill at all, full control, deep crawling with BFS, DFS and best-first strategies, and output already shaped for RAG ingestion. It is the most popular open-source crawler in the category, with roughly 82,000 GitHub stars.

What to watch. You own the ops: proxy rotation, browser fleet, retries, blocks and upgrades. Free software is not free infrastructure.

Diffbot

Free 10,000 credits a month, Startup $299 (250k credits), Plus $899 (1M credits), Enterprise custom. Overage is $0.001 a credit on Startup and $0.0009 on Plus

Where it wins. A pre-built Knowledge Graph of more than 10 billion entities you can query instead of crawling, and computer-vision extraction that classifies and structures pages with no per-site rules to write.

What to watch. The first paid tier is $299 a month and credits are consumed fast (a Knowledge Graph record costs 25 credits, a data-center proxy request doubles the cost), so for plain RAG ingestion it is expensive and heavier than you need.

ScrapeGraphAI

Free 500 credits, Starter $20 (10k credits), Growth $100 (100k), Pro $500 (750k), Enterprise custom, about 15 percent less billed yearly. The Python library is MIT licensed and free to self-host.

Where it wins. The open-source library (MIT, 30.8k GitHub stars) is a genuine option rather than a demo, it plugs into OpenAI, Groq, Azure, Gemini or a local Ollama model, and the managed API starts at $20 a month, just above the cheapest entry plans in the category.

What to watch. The managed API bills per credit and the rate depends on the endpoint (extract costs 5 credits, stealth adds 4 to 9 depending on the render mode, a crawl adds 2 on top of per-page scrape cost), so cost per page is harder to predict. Failed requests are not charged. Self-hosting means you supply the LLM key and pay model tokens on every page.

Want the full field, including Zyte? Read the best web scraping API buyer's guide.

Side by side

Zyte vs ClawEngine, honestly

A fair look at what each does well. Both are capable tools. Here is where they differ.

What matters ClawEngine Zyte
Anti-bot and unblocking None; public, permitted pages only, no blocking defeated Core strength, datacenter and residential proxies included
Cost model Flat monthly plans sized by page volume, $39 to $399 Per successful request, priced across five site difficulty tiers
Forecasting the bill Same number every month regardless of which sites you crawl Depends on tier mix; discounts need a $100 to $500 commitment
Structured extraction Any schema you declare, filled from the rendered page Fixed page types, plus custom attributes on top of one of them
Whole-site crawling Scoped crawl from a seed URL with path rules and a page budget Request-level API; crawl logic lives in Scrapy or your code
Getting started One POST with a URL and a schema, no framework required $5 starting credit; best value comes through scrapy-zyte-api
Failed requests Retries handled internally, billed against your plan volume Not billed at all; you pay only for successful responses
Best suited for Teams who want LLM-ready data without operating a crawler Python teams crawling defended sites at enterprise scale

Comparison reflects general, publicly understood positioning. Capabilities change, so check each product for the latest.

Why teams pick ClawEngine

One API that turns any website into clean, LLM-ready data

Tiered per-request pricing is fair and still hard to budget

Charging more for a site that fights back is more honest than one flat rate for everything, and Zyte deserves credit for it. The catch is procedural: you cannot fill in the line item for next quarter until you know which tier each target lands in, and that can change when a site adds protection. A flat plan is a worse deal on easy sites and a much easier number to defend in a budget review.

A fixed list of page types is a ceiling you meet suddenly

The automatic extraction in Zyte handles product, article, jobPosting, forumThread and serp shapes well, because those pages have been modeled deliberately. Everything works until the day your target is a county permit record or an insurance rate table, and then you are writing selectors again inside a product you bought to avoid writing selectors. Declaring your own schema removes that cliff entirely.

Unblocking and ingestion are different purchases

If the hard part of your job is getting a response at all, buy unblocking, and Zyte is one of the two or three best places to buy it. If the hard part is that the response is 400KB of HTML nobody can use, buy ingestion. Teams overpay by buying heavy unblocking for public documentation sites, and they under-buy by pointing a clean-data pipeline at a target that blocks it.

People also ask

Zyte alternatives: the questions buyers ask

What is the best Zyte alternative?

It depends which part of Zyte you actually use. If you rely on its unblocking against defended sites, Bright Data and ZenRows are the closest like-for-like swaps. If you use it to turn pages into clean, LLM-ready data, ClawEngine and Firecrawl both do that in fewer moving parts. If you use Scrapy Cloud to host spiders you already wrote, no managed API replaces that directly, because you would be giving up the spiders too.

What is Zyte used for?

Zyte API is a single endpoint that fetches a page through datacenter or residential proxies, optionally renders it in a browser, and can return AI-extracted data for known page types. It grew out of Scrapinghub, the company that created and still maintains Scrapy, so it is most often found underneath Python crawling stacks and inside teams that run spiders at scale.

How much does Zyte API cost?

Zyte bills per successful request, and the rate depends on the target site. Its documentation assigns every request to one of five tiers for HTTP and five for browser requests, so an easy site and a defended one cost very different amounts. Volume discounts come from a monthly commitment: 25 percent at $100, 40 percent at $200, 48 percent at $350 and 52 percent at $500. New standard accounts get $5 of free credit, enterprise accounts $200.

Does Zyte have a free plan?

Not a recurring one. Zyte gives new standard accounts $5 of initial credit and enterprise accounts $200, which is enough to test against your real targets before committing. After that you pay per successful request. Rate-limited and failed responses are not billed, which is a genuinely fair detail and one of the better parts of their pricing model.

Does Zyte extract structured data?

Yes, for page types it already knows. Automatic extraction covers article, articleList, articleNavigation, forumThread, jobPosting, jobPostingNavigation, pageContent, product, productList, productNavigation and serp. You can add custom attributes on top with an LLM-based schema, but a standard type still has to be requested alongside it. If your target is a page shape that is not on that list, you are back to writing selectors.

Good questions

Zyte vs ClawEngine, answered

Keep Zyte if your crawl depends on reaching sites that actively block you, or if you have Scrapy spiders you are not rewriting. Move when most of your targets are public and cooperative and the real work has shifted to cleaning and structuring what comes back. That is the point where you are paying for unblocking you no longer need and still writing the parsing layer yourself.
Sometimes, and it depends entirely on your targets. On easy, server-rendered sites at low volume, per-request billing with no charge for failures can land well under a published $39 floor. On browser-rendered pages across harder tiers, or once a $100 to $500 monthly commitment is needed to reach a sensible discount, flat plans usually win on both price and predictability.
On defended sites, on Python ecosystem fit and on enterprise depth. Zyte ships proxy rotation and unblocking we deliberately do not offer, integrates natively with Scrapy through scrapy-zyte-api, hosts spiders on Scrapy Cloud, and sells managed data services with contracts and account management behind them. For a large team already standardized on Scrapy, that is a real advantage.
Yes, and splitting by target is the sensible pattern. Route the handful of sources that actively block you through Zyte, where the unblocking is worth paying for, and route documentation sites, public catalogs, newsrooms and government pages through a crawl and extract call that returns typed JSON. Most pipelines have far fewer genuinely defended targets than they assume.

More comparisons

See how ClawEngine compares

vs Firecrawl

Firecrawl alternative

Crawl, render JS and extract typed fields in one call, with compliance-first defaults.

vs Apify

Apify alternative

Skip the actor marketplace: one API returns LLM-ready markdown and typed JSON.

vs Bright Data

Bright Data alternative

LLM-ready output and one simple API, instead of running your own proxy stack.

vs ScrapingBee

ScrapingBee alternative

More than raw HTML: crawl plus typed extraction and LLM-ready markdown in one call.

vs ScraperAPI

ScraperAPI alternative

Past the proxy layer: crawl, render and typed extraction that returns LLM-ready data.

vs ZenRows

ZenRows alternative

Beyond unblocking: crawl, render and typed extraction that returns LLM-ready data.

vs Oxylabs

Oxylabs alternative

Enterprise unblocking is not the same as LLM-ready data. Crawl, render and extract in one call.

vs Crawl4AI

Crawl4AI alternative

Free to license, not free to run. The managed alternative when ops time costs more than the bill.

vs Diffbot

Diffbot alternative

A lighter, lower-cost managed API when you need clean page data for RAG, not a 10-billion-entity Knowledge Graph.

vs ScrapeGraphAI

ScrapeGraphAI alternative

Predictable per-page cost and typed schema extraction, with no LLM key to supply and no token bill per page.

vs Scrapy

Scrapy alternative

Rendering, retries and typed extraction as a managed call, with no spiders or browser fleet to operate.

vs Browserbase

Browserbase alternative

When you need pages read at volume rather than a browser session driven step by step.

vs Exa

Exa alternative

For teams who already know which sites they need and want the whole site crawled, not semantically searched.

vs Tavily

Tavily alternative

For teams past the prototype: scoped crawls, page budgets and typed fields pulled from the rendered page.

vs Jina Reader

Jina Reader alternative

Whole-site crawling and typed schema extraction, for teams who have outgrown reading one URL at a time.

vs Parallel AI

Parallel AI alternative

Live pages and whole-site crawling, when a cached index and excerpts are not enough.

vs Scrapfly

Scrapfly alternative

Flat per-page pricing with rendering included, instead of a 6x browser multiplier.

vs Olostep

Olostep alternative

A published per-page rate you can forecast, instead of a credit count you learn after the call.

Turn any website into clean, LLM-ready data

One API: a URL in, clean markdown or typed JSON out. ClawEngine crawls, renders JavaScript and extracts typed structured fields in a single call, ready to embed for your RAG pipelines and AI agents.

See pricing

LLM-ready output · one API call · public, permitted data only · robots.txt respected