ClawEngine.ai

Compare

Browse AI alternatives and 11 scraping APIs compared on cost per detail page

The short answer

The best Browse AI alternative depends on who runs the scraper. If nobody on the team writes code, Octoparse is the closest swap, because it is also point and click and it bills by task count rather than by rows. If you have developers and want prebuilt scrapers for popular sites, Apify is the usual pick. If you need typed fields from thousands of detail pages at a bill you can forecast, a per-page crawl API such as ClawEngine or Firecrawl is cheaper. The reason is one rule in Browse AI pricing: 10 rows cost 1 credit, but every task costs at least 1 credit, and every detail page you open is its own task. On the largest Professional annual tier that is about $1.06 per 1,000 list rows and $10.63 per 1,000 detail pages. ClawEngine bills one page per page at $0.98, $0.40 or $0.27 per 1,000 on its Hobby, Startup and Scale plans. Browse AI still wins on its recorder, its built-in monitoring alerts and its free tier, and this page says so.

Browse AI is a good product with a meter that punishes one specific shape of work. You train a robot by clicking through a site, it learns which elements to pull, and it can re-run on a schedule and alert you when something changes. For an operations or marketing team that cannot write code, that is worth paying for, and nothing in the API category replaces the recorder.

The trouble starts when the data you need lives on detail pages. Ten rows cost one credit, which sounds cheap, but every task costs at least one credit and every product, listing or profile page you open counts as its own task. A crawl of 1,000 detail pages therefore costs 1,000 credits whatever you extract from each. That is the point where teams start looking for a Browse AI alternative, and the right one depends on whether you want to stay no-code or move to an API.

Crawl · render JS · extract typed fields · robots.txt respected

Extraction demo
POST
Try:

Hit Extract to turn this page into clean, LLM-ready data.

robots.txt respected · public data only ·

Markdown · JSON · structured fields, from one API call. Crawling, rendering and extracting ... Samples are recorded. Your own URL is crawled live.

Browse AI is the stronger buy when the person running the scraper does not code, when the targets are a handful of list pages, and when built-in monitoring alerts matter more than throughput. ClawEngine is the better fit when you need typed fields from thousands of detail pages, because one crawled, rendered, schema-typed page is one page of allowance, so the bill is the page count and nothing else.

All the options

11 Browse AI alternatives, compared

Published US list prices, checked in September 2026. We include ourselves, and we say where each tool beats us.

Swipe to compare all columns →

Alternative Starts at Free tier Output Best for
ClawEngine $49/mo No free plan Clean markdown or typed JSON Teams that want one compliance-first pipeline returning LLM-ready data for RAG and agents
Firecrawl $16/mo Yes, 1,000 credits a month Clean markdown, plus structured extraction Fast site-to-markdown for LLM workflows, and teams that want the option to self-host
Bright Data Usage-based 5,000 records or requests a month per product JSON and datasets, not markdown-first Enterprise-scale proxy networks and prebuilt datasets for hard, heavily defended targets
Apify $19/mo Yes, $5 credits JSON, CSV and dataset exports Teams that want a prebuilt scraper for a specific site rather than building one
ScrapingBee $19/mo 1,000 free API credits, no card Raw HTML, with some extraction rules Simple proxy plus JavaScript rendering behind a clean REST API
ScraperAPI $49/mo 1,000 credits a month, plus a 7-day 5,000-credit trial Raw HTML, with structured endpoints for some sites High-volume proxy rotation at a low cost per request
ZenRows $16/mo Yes, 5,000 credits a month HTML, with markdown and parsing options Sites behind aggressive anti-bot systems
Oxylabs $49/mo Trial, up to 2,000 results HTML, JSON via parsers, and markdown Enterprises pulling high volumes from hard, well-known targets like major marketplaces
Crawl4AI Free, open source Yes, fully open source Markdown, Fit Markdown, or JSON for embedding Engineering teams happy to run and maintain the infrastructure themselves
Diffbot $299/mo Yes, 10,000 credits a month Structured JSON entities, plus a Knowledge Graph Enterprises that need web-wide entity intelligence and rule-less extraction across many different site layouts
ScrapeGraphAI $20/mo Yes, 500 credits Structured JSON from a natural-language prompt or schema, plus markdown Teams that want LLM-driven extraction from a plain-English prompt, or an MIT-licensed Python library they can run themselves

ClawEngine

Hobby $49, Startup $99, Scale $399, Enterprise custom

Where it wins. Crawl, JavaScript rendering and typed schema extraction happen in a single API call, and robots.txt plus site Terms of Service are respected by default.

What to watch. There is no free plan, so it is priced for teams running real pipelines rather than one-off experiments.

Firecrawl

Free 1,000 credits a month (2 concurrent), Hobby $16 (5k credits, 5 concurrent), Standard $83 (100k, 25), Growth $333 (500k, 50), Scale $599 (1M, 100), Enterprise by quote. Prices shown are the billed-yearly rate; billed monthly, Hobby is $19, Standard $99 and Growth $399

Where it wins. Excellent developer experience, a well-loved open-source project, and markdown output tuned for token efficiency.

What to watch. The headline 1 credit a page is the plain scrape only. Asking for structured JSON adds 4 credits, so a page you want back as typed fields is 5 credits, which turns Standard from $0.83 into $4.15 per 1,000 pages. PDF parsing adds 1 credit a PDF page, a prompt injection check adds 4, zero data retention adds 1, Map is 1 credit a call, Search is 2 per 10 results, and Interact is 2 to 7 credits a browser minute. A page that comes back as a 403 or 404 still costs 1 credit; only a request that returns no document at all is free. Plan credits do not roll over except on annual Scale, and pay-as-you-go top-ups run $5.00 per 1,000 extra credits on Hobby, $2.50 on Standard, $2.00 on Growth and $1.00 on Scale, up to three times the in-plan rate.

Bright Data

Web Scraper API billed per record: free tier 5,000 records a month, pay-as-you-go $1.50 per 1,000, Scale $499 a month for 384,000 records then $1.30 per 1,000, Enterprise by quote. You pay only for successful deliveries. Web Unlocker and SERP API use the same $1.50 and $1.30 rates per 1,000 requests, while the Browser API is metered by bandwidth at $8 per GB pay-as-you-go

Where it wins. The largest proxy network in the category (150M+ residential IPs across 195 countries) and hundreds of prebuilt domain scrapers and ready-made datasets.

What to watch. It is a broad platform rather than a single LLM-ready endpoint, so output usually needs cleaning before you can embed it, and the pricing surface is complex: each product has its own meter (records, requests or gigabytes), plans carry a minimum monthly commitment billed from the 1st, and unused plan volume does not roll over.

Apify

Free ($5 usage), Starter $19, Scale $199, Business $999 billed monthly (about 10 percent less billed annually), each including that dollar value of usage. Actor compute is billed per compute unit at $0.20 (Free and Starter), $0.16 (Scale) or $0.13 (Business), with proxies charged on top

Where it wins. A marketplace of thousands of prebuilt Actors, so common targets are already solved, plus a full automation and scheduling platform.

What to watch. Costs stack in layers: the plan buys a dollar allowance, Actor compute burns it at $0.13 to $0.20 per compute unit, and residential proxies add $7 to $8 per GB on top. Unused allowance expires monthly, and output is generic JSON rather than LLM-ready markdown.

ScrapingBee

Hobby $19 (75k credits, 25 concurrent), Freelance $49 (250k, 50), Startup $99 (1M, 100), Business $249 (3M, 200), Business+ $599 (8M, 400), then Enterprise plans by quote with higher concurrency

Where it wins. Very easy to adopt, dependable rendering, and a Google Search API bundled into every tier.

What to watch. JavaScript rendering is on by default and costs 5 credits, so a Freelance plan is 50,000 rendered pages rather than the 250,000 the credit count suggests. Premium proxy is 10 credits alone or 25 with rendering, and stealth proxy is 75. Responses with a 200, 404 or 410 status are billed. You also mostly get HTML back, so the cleaning, chunking and structuring work for an LLM is still yours to do.

ScraperAPI

Free plan 1,000 credits at 5 threads, plus a 7-day trial of 5,000. Hobby $49 (100k credits, 20 threads), Startup $149 (1M, 50), Business $299 (3M, 100), Scaling $475 (5M, 200), Professional $975 (10.5M, 300), Advanced $1,975 (21.5M, 500), Enterprise by quote above 22M. Annual billing takes 10 percent off every tier

Where it wins. Strong price per request at volume and a very simple drop-in proxy API.

What to watch. The multipliers decide the bill: a plain request is 1 credit, render 10, premium 10, screenshot 10, premium with render 25, ultra premium 30 and ultra premium with render 75, while Amazon, Walmart and eBay cost 5, Google and Bing 25 and LinkedIn 30, and clearing Cloudflare, DataDome or PerimeterX adds 10. Two policies matter more than the rates: credits do not roll over, and pay-as-you-go overage is available only on Scaling and above, so hitting 100 percent on Hobby, Startup or Business stops the pipeline until you upgrade. Only 200 and 404 responses are billed. It is proxy infrastructure first, so an LLM pipeline still needs its own parsing, boilerplate stripping and schema layer.

ZenRows

Free tier (5,000 credits a month, 5 concurrent), Build $16 (45,000 credits, 20 concurrent), Launch $57 (250,000, 50), Growth $165 (1.2M, 100), Scale $456 (5M, 200), Enterprise custom (400 to 1000+ concurrent). Prices shown are the billed-yearly rate; billed monthly they are $19, $69, $199 and $549

Where it wins. Focused on getting through Cloudflare, DataDome and PerimeterX where simpler fetchers fail.

What to watch. The multipliers set the real price, not the headline credit count: a plain fetch is 1 credit, a JavaScript-rendered page is 5, premium proxies are 10, and premium with rendering is 25, which is the ceiling. Residential bandwidth is billed at a flat 25,000 credits per GB, and Browser Sessions add 5 credits a minute on top of bandwidth. Launch at $57 therefore buys about 50,000 rendered pages. Failed requests are not charged, but 404 and 410 responses count as successful. You also get HTML back, so the cleaning and structuring work for an LLM is still yours.

Oxylabs

Web Scraper API: free trial up to 2,000 results, Micro $49 (up to 98,000), Starter $99 (up to 220,000), Advanced $249 (up to 622,500), Business $999 (up to 3,330,000), Custom by quote. Residential proxies are a separate purchase: $30/5GB, $100/20GB, $500/125GB, $2,500/1TB, which is $6.00 down to $2.50 per GB

Where it wins. Enterprise-grade unblocking, a large global proxy network, and dedicated parsers for major targets, plus a free Custom Parser for your own CSS or XPath rules.

What to watch. Two rules move the real bill. First, rates are set by target category, roughly $0.25 to $0.50 per 1,000 for Amazon, $0.50 to $1.00 for Google, $0.70 to $1.15 for other sources and $0.95 to $1.35 with JavaScript rendering, and the headline result count is quoted against the cheapest one. Oxylabs own maximum-results table shows the same free trial buying 2,000 Amazon results but only 769 JavaScript-rendered results from an ordinary site, a 2.6 times spread that carries up the whole ladder. Second, the billing documentation counts any 2xx or 4xx response as a successful result, so a 404 on a dead link or a 403 from a site that blocked you is billed at full rate. Whole-site crawling means buying a second product.

Crawl4AI

Apache-2.0, no license cost. You pay for your own servers, proxies and engineering time. A hosted Cloud API is in closed beta with no public pricing

Where it wins. No vendor bill at all, full control, deep crawling with BFS, DFS and best-first strategies, and output already shaped for RAG ingestion. It is the most popular open-source crawler in the category, with roughly 82,000 GitHub stars.

What to watch. You own the ops: proxy rotation, browser fleet, retries, blocks and upgrades. Free software is not free infrastructure.

Diffbot

Free 10,000 credits a month, Startup $299 (250k credits), Plus $899 (1M credits), Enterprise custom. Overage is $0.001 a credit on Startup and $0.0009 on Plus

Where it wins. A pre-built Knowledge Graph of more than 10 billion entities you can query instead of crawling, and computer-vision extraction that classifies and structures pages with no per-site rules to write.

What to watch. The first paid tier is $299 a month and credits are consumed fast (a Knowledge Graph record costs 25 credits, a data-center proxy request doubles the cost), so for plain RAG ingestion it is expensive and heavier than you need.

ScrapeGraphAI

Free 500 credits, Starter $20 (10k credits), Growth $100 (100k), Pro $500 (750k), Enterprise custom, about 15 percent less billed yearly. The Python library is MIT licensed and free to self-host.

Where it wins. The open-source library (MIT, 30.8k GitHub stars) is a genuine option rather than a demo, it plugs into OpenAI, Groq, Azure, Gemini or a local Ollama model, and the managed API starts at $20 a month, just above the cheapest entry plans in the category.

What to watch. The managed API bills per credit and the rate depends on the endpoint (extract costs 5 credits, stealth adds 4 to 9 depending on the render mode, a crawl adds 2 on top of per-page scrape cost), so cost per page is harder to predict. Failed requests are not charged. Self-hosting means you supply the LLM key and pay model tokens on every page.

Want the full field, including Browse AI? Read the best web scraping API buyer's guide.

Side by side

Browse AI vs ClawEngine, honestly

A fair look at what each does well. Both are capable tools. Here is where they differ.

What matters ClawEngine Browse AI
How work is priced Flat monthly page allowance, one page per page Credits, 10 rows per credit with a 1 credit minimum per task
Cost per 1,000 detail pages $0.98 Hobby, $0.40 Startup, $0.27 Scale $24.00 Personal monthly down to $10.63 Professional annual
Cost per 1,000 list rows One page per listing page, however many rows it holds $2.40 Personal monthly down to $1.06 Professional annual
Protected or premium sites Not offered. We do not defeat anti-bot systems Handled at 2 to 10 credits minimum per task
No-code recorder None. You send a URL and a JSON schema Yes, train a robot by clicking in the browser
Scheduled monitoring and alerts You schedule fetches and diff results yourself Built in, with change alerts on every robot
Typed schema extraction Declare any schema, filled in the same call at the same rate Fields chosen by clicking, exported as rows
Whole-site crawling Scoped crawl from a seed URL with depth rules and a page budget List robot plus bulk runs over detail URLs
LLM-ready markdown Yes, clean markdown on every page Not the focus. Output is rows, CSV and integrations
Entry price $49 Hobby, no free plan. Live extraction console to try Free tier of 50 credits, then $19 a month billed annually
Best suited for Engineering teams pulling typed data from many pages Non-developers watching a few sites for changes

Comparison reflects general, publicly understood positioning. Capabilities change, so check each product for the latest.

Why teams pick ClawEngine

One API that turns any website into clean, LLM-ready data

The task minimum, not the row rate, sets your bill

Browse AI publishes its own worked example. A list of 100 product links costs 10 credits, because 100 rows at 0.1 credits each. Opening those 100 product pages costs 100 credits, one per task. Same products, ten times the cost for the half of the job that holds the specifications, descriptions and prices most teams actually want. Before comparing plans, count how many of your fields live on a listing and how many sit one click deeper.

Stay no-code or move to an API, then compare prices

Octoparse and Browse AI sell to the same person and differ mainly on the meter. Apify, Firecrawl and ClawEngine sell to developers and differ on what one unit buys. Comparing a no-code recorder with an API on price alone hides the real cost, which is who maintains the scraper when the site changes. Decide that first. The price comparison inside each group is then easy.

What you give up by leaving Browse AI

ClawEngine has no recorder, no built-in monitoring and no change alerts, so somebody writes the cron job and the diff. We do not defeat bot protection, which is what the Browse AI premium tier charges extra for. There is no free plan. If those are the reasons you chose Browse AI, keep it for those sites and move only the high-volume detail-page crawls to a per-page plan.

People also ask

Browse AI alternatives, the questions buyers ask

What is the best alternative to Browse AI?

For non-technical teams, Octoparse, because it keeps the point-and-click workflow and does not meter rows. For developers who want a ready-made scraper for a known site, Apify and its marketplace of Actors. For high-volume extraction of detail pages into typed JSON, a per-page crawl API: ClawEngine at $0.40 per 1,000 pages on Startup, or Firecrawl at $0.83 per 1,000 plain pages on annual Standard. Pick by who maintains the scraper, not by headline price.

How much does Browse AI cost?

Browse AI has a free tier with 50 credits a month, Personal at $48 a month for 2,000 credits or $19 a month billed annually for 12,000 credits a year, Professional at $87 to $399 a month for 5,000 to 30,000 credits or $69 to $319 a month billed annually for 60,000 to 360,000 credits a year, and Premium from $500 a month on annual billing. All figures were read from the Browse AI pricing page in October 2026.

How are Browse AI credits calculated?

On a standard site, 10 rows of data cost 1 credit and one screenshot costs 1 credit, but the minimum cost of any task is 1 credit. On sites Browse AI classes as premium, because of bot detection, CAPTCHAs or complex structure, the minimum rises to 2 to 10 credits per task. Opening a detail page is a task, so a product page costs at least a full credit even when it yields one row.

Is Browse AI better than Apify?

Browse AI is better when the person building the scraper cannot code, because you train a robot by clicking and get change alerts without writing anything. Apify is better when you have developers, need a scraper someone has already built for a specific site, or need logins and multi-step flows. Apify bills compute, from $0.20 per compute unit on Starter to $0.13 on Business, so its cost per page depends on the Actor you run.

Is Browse AI better than Octoparse?

They solve the same job for the same buyer, a non-developer who wants data from a website, with different meters. Browse AI bills credits per 10 rows with a 1 credit minimum per task, which suits small, frequent monitoring jobs. Octoparse bills by the number of tasks you keep configured, with unlimited export on paid plans from $83 a month, or $69 billed annually, which suits large one-off pulls from a few sites.

Is Browse AI better than Firecrawl?

They are built for different people. Browse AI is a no-code recorder with scheduling and alerts. Firecrawl is a developer API that returns markdown or JSON for a URL or a whole site, billed one credit per plain page, with structured JSON adding 4 credits a page. If your end use is an LLM or RAG pipeline, Firecrawl or ClawEngine fits better. If it is a spreadsheet updated by an operations team, Browse AI fits better.

Does Browse AI have an API?

Yes. Browse AI exposes a REST API and webhooks for running robots and retrieving their results, so a developer can trigger tasks from code. The API still runs robots trained in the Browse AI interface and bills the same credits, so it does not change the per-task minimum. A crawl API differs in that you send a URL and a schema and get typed fields back, with no robot to train.

Why is Browse AI expensive for detail pages?

Because the 10-rows-per-credit rate only applies when many rows sit on one page. A detail page is a separate task with a 1 credit minimum, so 1,000 product pages cost at least 1,000 credits, which is $10.63 per 1,000 on the cheapest Professional annual rate and $24 per 1,000 on Personal monthly. A list page holding 50 products costs 5 credits for all 50.

What is the cheapest Browse AI alternative for scraping at scale?

For plain public pages at volume, a per-page API usually is. ClawEngine Scale is $399 a month for about 1,500,000 pages, or $0.27 per 1,000, with JavaScript rendering and schema-typed JSON at the same rate. A lean Apify Actor on a simple HTTP site can go lower still, but its cost moves with runtime. Neither matches Browse AI on protected sites, where its 2 to 10 credit premium tier is doing work a plain API does not do.

Can I replace Browse AI monitoring with an API?

Yes, if someone on the team can schedule a job. You fetch the watched pages on a cron, store the extracted fields, and alert when a value changes. Ten pages checked hourly is 7,200 fetches a month, which fits inside the ClawEngine Hobby allowance of about 50,000 pages, against roughly 7,200 credits on Browse AI. What you give up is the ready-made alert UI, which you would now build.

Good questions

Browse AI vs ClawEngine, answered

Keep it for the jobs where its strengths matter: a few watched pages, a non-technical owner, alerts that land in Slack or email. Move the jobs where the task minimum hurts, which are crawls over hundreds or thousands of detail pages. Running both is normal, and it usually cuts the bill more than switching everything.
On the recorder, on monitoring, on protected sites and on entry price. You can train a robot without code, it re-runs on a schedule with change alerts built in, its premium tier handles sites with bot detection that we do not touch, and it has a free tier where we have none.
On Browse AI, 10,000 detail pages are at least 10,000 credits a month, which fits the Professional annual tier of 120,000 credits a year at $129 a month, billed for the full year upfront. On ClawEngine, 10,000 pages fit inside Hobby at $49 a month with about 40,000 pages to spare.
Not directly, because a robot is a recording rather than code. In practice you list the fields the robot captures, write them as a JSON schema, and send the same URLs with that schema. Most teams can rebuild a robot this way in under an hour, then run both side by side for a week to compare the output.

More comparisons

See how ClawEngine compares

vs Firecrawl

Firecrawl alternative

Crawl, render JS and extract typed fields in one call, with compliance-first defaults.

vs Apify

Apify alternative

Skip the actor marketplace: one API returns LLM-ready markdown and typed JSON.

vs Bright Data

Bright Data alternative

LLM-ready output and one simple API, instead of running your own proxy stack.

vs ScrapingBee

ScrapingBee alternative

More than raw HTML: crawl plus typed extraction and LLM-ready markdown in one call.

vs ScraperAPI

ScraperAPI alternative

Past the proxy layer: crawl, render and typed extraction that returns LLM-ready data.

vs ZenRows

ZenRows alternative

Beyond unblocking: crawl, render and typed extraction that returns LLM-ready data.

vs Oxylabs

Oxylabs alternative

Enterprise unblocking is not the same as LLM-ready data. Crawl, render and extract in one call.

vs Crawl4AI

Crawl4AI alternative

Free to license, not free to run. The managed alternative when ops time costs more than the bill.

vs Diffbot

Diffbot alternative

A lighter, lower-cost managed API when you need clean page data for RAG, not a 10-billion-entity Knowledge Graph.

vs ScrapeGraphAI

ScrapeGraphAI alternative

Predictable per-page cost and typed schema extraction, with no LLM key to supply and no token bill per page.

vs Scrapy

Scrapy alternative

Rendering, retries and typed extraction as a managed call, with no spiders or browser fleet to operate.

vs Browserbase

Browserbase alternative

When you need pages read at volume rather than a browser session driven step by step.

vs Exa

Exa alternative

For teams who already know which sites they need and want the whole site crawled, not semantically searched.

vs Tavily

Tavily alternative

For teams past the prototype: scoped crawls, page budgets and typed fields pulled from the rendered page.

vs Jina Reader

Jina Reader alternative

Whole-site crawling and typed schema extraction, for teams who have outgrown reading one URL at a time.

vs Zyte

Zyte alternative

Flat monthly plans and typed schema extraction, without per-tier request pricing you cannot forecast.

vs Parallel AI

Parallel AI alternative

Live pages and whole-site crawling, when a cached index and excerpts are not enough.

vs Scrapfly

Scrapfly alternative

Flat per-page pricing with rendering included, instead of a 6x browser multiplier.

vs Olostep

Olostep alternative

A published per-page rate you can forecast, instead of a credit count you learn after the call.

Turn any website into clean, LLM-ready data

One API: a URL in, clean markdown or typed JSON out. ClawEngine crawls, renders JavaScript and extracts typed structured fields in a single call, ready to embed for your RAG pipelines and AI agents.

See pricing

LLM-ready output · one API call · public, permitted data only · robots.txt respected