ClawEngine.ai

Compare

Browserbase alternatives: 11 tools compared for AI agents that browse and scrape

The short answer

Browserbase and a scraping API solve two different problems, so the right alternative depends on whether your agent needs to act on a page or just read it. Browserbase rents you a real cloud browser you drive with Playwright, Puppeteer or its own Stagehand framework, billed by browser hour, from a free tier and $20 a month. That is the correct tool for logging in, clicking through multi-step flows and filling forms. If your agent only needs to read public pages and get structured data back, a browser session is an expensive and slow unit of work: ClawEngine crawls, renders and extracts typed fields in one call from $39 a month, and Firecrawl is the markdown-first option at $16.

Browserbase is genuinely good at what it does, and it is worth being clear about what that is. It is infrastructure: a fleet of real cloud browsers you connect to over the Chrome DevTools Protocol and drive yourself with Playwright, Puppeteer or Stagehand, its open-source natural-language wrapper. Sessions are recorded and debuggable, concurrency scales, and the free tier plus a $20 Developer plan make it easy to start. For an agent that has to log into a portal, tick a box and submit a form, that is exactly the shape of tool you want, and no crawl-and-extract API is going to replace it.

The reason teams end up comparing it with a scraping API is that most agent work is not interaction, it is reading. Research, RAG ingestion, documentation crawls, competitor monitoring and training-data collection are all read-only, and reading through a driven browser session is the most expensive way to do it. You write the automation, you keep it working when layouts move, you hold sessions open, and you are billed in browser hours plus proxy gigabytes rather than in pages. ClawEngine takes the other approach: you POST a URL and a schema, rendering happens server side, and clean markdown or typed JSON comes back. It runs on public and permitted data only, respects robots.txt and site Terms of Service, and honors crawl-delay. It cannot sign in as you or click through a flow, and it is not meant to.

Crawl · render JS · extract typed fields · robots.txt respected

Extraction demo
POST
Try:

Hit Extract to turn this page into clean, LLM-ready data.

robots.txt respected · public data only ·

Markdown · JSON · structured fields, from one API call. Crawling, rendering and extracting ... Samples are recorded. Your own URL is crawled live.

Browserbase is the stronger choice when an agent has to act on a page, driving a real browser session through logins, forms and multi-step flows, while ClawEngine is the better fit when the agent only needs to read public pages and get typed data back without writing automation.

All the options

11 Browserbase alternatives, compared

Published US list prices, checked in September 2026. We include ourselves, and we say where each tool beats us.

Swipe to compare all columns →

Alternative Starts at Free tier Output Best for
ClawEngine $39/mo No free plan Clean markdown or typed JSON Teams that want one compliance-first pipeline returning LLM-ready data for RAG and agents
Firecrawl $16/mo Yes, 1,000 credits a month Clean markdown, plus structured extraction Fast site-to-markdown for LLM workflows, and teams that want the option to self-host
Bright Data Usage-based 5,000 records or requests a month per product JSON and datasets, not markdown-first Enterprise-scale proxy networks and prebuilt datasets for hard, heavily defended targets
Apify $19/mo Yes, $5 credits JSON, CSV and dataset exports Teams that want a prebuilt scraper for a specific site rather than building one
ScrapingBee $19/mo 1,000 free API credits, no card Raw HTML, with some extraction rules Simple proxy plus JavaScript rendering behind a clean REST API
ScraperAPI $49/mo 1,000 credits a month, plus a 7-day 5,000-credit trial Raw HTML, with structured endpoints for some sites High-volume proxy rotation at a low cost per request
ZenRows $16/mo Yes, 5,000 credits a month HTML, with markdown and parsing options Sites behind aggressive anti-bot systems
Oxylabs $49/mo Trial, up to 2,000 results HTML, JSON via parsers, and markdown Enterprises pulling high volumes from hard, well-known targets like major marketplaces
Crawl4AI Free, open source Yes, fully open source Markdown, Fit Markdown, or JSON for embedding Engineering teams happy to run and maintain the infrastructure themselves
Diffbot $299/mo Yes, 10,000 credits a month Structured JSON entities, plus a Knowledge Graph Enterprises that need web-wide entity intelligence and rule-less extraction across many different site layouts
ScrapeGraphAI $20/mo Yes, 500 credits Structured JSON from a natural-language prompt or schema, plus markdown Teams that want LLM-driven extraction from a plain-English prompt, or an MIT-licensed Python library they can run themselves

ClawEngine

Hobby $39, Startup $99, Scale $399, Enterprise custom

Where it wins. Crawl, JavaScript rendering and typed schema extraction happen in a single API call, and robots.txt plus site Terms of Service are respected by default.

What to watch. There is no free plan, so it is priced for teams running real pipelines rather than one-off experiments.

Firecrawl

Free 1,000 credits a month (2 concurrent), Hobby $16 (5k credits, 5 concurrent), Standard $83 (100k, 25), Growth $333 (500k, 50), Scale $599 (1M, 100), Enterprise by quote. Prices shown are the billed-yearly rate; billed monthly, Hobby is $19, Standard $99 and Growth $399

Where it wins. Excellent developer experience, a well-loved open-source project, and markdown output tuned for token efficiency.

What to watch. The headline 1 credit a page is the plain scrape only. Asking for structured JSON adds 4 credits, so a page you want back as typed fields is 5 credits, which turns Standard from $0.83 into $4.15 per 1,000 pages. PDF parsing adds 1 credit a PDF page, a prompt injection check adds 4, zero data retention adds 1, Map is 1 credit a call, Search is 2 per 10 results, and Interact is 2 to 7 credits a browser minute. A page that comes back as a 403 or 404 still costs 1 credit; only a request that returns no document at all is free. Plan credits do not roll over except on annual Scale, and pay-as-you-go top-ups run $5.00 per 1,000 extra credits on Hobby, $2.50 on Standard, $2.00 on Growth and $1.00 on Scale, up to three times the in-plan rate.

Bright Data

Web Scraper API billed per record: free tier 5,000 records a month, pay-as-you-go $1.50 per 1,000, Scale $499 a month for 384,000 records then $1.30 per 1,000, Enterprise by quote. You pay only for successful deliveries. Web Unlocker and SERP API use the same $1.50 and $1.30 rates per 1,000 requests, while the Browser API is metered by bandwidth at $8 per GB pay-as-you-go

Where it wins. The largest proxy network in the category (150M+ residential IPs across 195 countries) and hundreds of prebuilt domain scrapers and ready-made datasets.

What to watch. It is a broad platform rather than a single LLM-ready endpoint, so output usually needs cleaning before you can embed it, and the pricing surface is complex: each product has its own meter (records, requests or gigabytes), plans carry a minimum monthly commitment billed from the 1st, and unused plan volume does not roll over.

Apify

Free ($5 usage), Starter $19, Scale $199, Business $999 billed monthly (about 10 percent less billed annually), each including that dollar value of usage. Actor compute is billed per compute unit at $0.20 (Free and Starter), $0.16 (Scale) or $0.13 (Business), with proxies charged on top

Where it wins. A marketplace of thousands of prebuilt Actors, so common targets are already solved, plus a full automation and scheduling platform.

What to watch. Costs stack in layers: the plan buys a dollar allowance, Actor compute burns it at $0.13 to $0.20 per compute unit, and residential proxies add $7 to $8 per GB on top. Unused allowance expires monthly, and output is generic JSON rather than LLM-ready markdown.

ScrapingBee

Hobby $19 (75k credits, 25 concurrent), Freelance $49 (250k, 50), Startup $99 (1M, 100), Business $249 (3M, 200), Business+ $599 (8M, 400), then Enterprise plans by quote with higher concurrency

Where it wins. Very easy to adopt, dependable rendering, and a Google Search API bundled into every tier.

What to watch. JavaScript rendering is on by default and costs 5 credits, so a Freelance plan is 50,000 rendered pages rather than the 250,000 the credit count suggests. Premium proxy is 10 credits alone or 25 with rendering, and stealth proxy is 75. Responses with a 200, 404 or 410 status are billed. You also mostly get HTML back, so the cleaning, chunking and structuring work for an LLM is still yours to do.

ScraperAPI

Free plan 1,000 credits at 5 threads, plus a 7-day trial of 5,000. Hobby $49 (100k credits, 20 threads), Startup $149 (1M, 50), Business $299 (3M, 100), Scaling $475 (5M, 200), Professional $975 (10.5M, 300), Advanced $1,975 (21.5M, 500), Enterprise by quote above 22M. Annual billing takes 10 percent off every tier

Where it wins. Strong price per request at volume and a very simple drop-in proxy API.

What to watch. The multipliers decide the bill: a plain request is 1 credit, render 10, premium 10, screenshot 10, premium with render 25, ultra premium 30 and ultra premium with render 75, while Amazon, Walmart and eBay cost 5, Google and Bing 25 and LinkedIn 30, and clearing Cloudflare, DataDome or PerimeterX adds 10. Two policies matter more than the rates: credits do not roll over, and pay-as-you-go overage is available only on Scaling and above, so hitting 100 percent on Hobby, Startup or Business stops the pipeline until you upgrade. Only 200 and 404 responses are billed. It is proxy infrastructure first, so an LLM pipeline still needs its own parsing, boilerplate stripping and schema layer.

ZenRows

Free tier (5,000 credits a month, 5 concurrent), Build $16 (45,000 credits, 20 concurrent), Launch $57 (250,000, 50), Growth $165 (1.2M, 100), Scale $456 (5M, 200), Enterprise custom (400 to 1000+ concurrent). Prices shown are the billed-yearly rate; billed monthly they are $19, $69, $199 and $549

Where it wins. Focused on getting through Cloudflare, DataDome and PerimeterX where simpler fetchers fail.

What to watch. The multipliers set the real price, not the headline credit count: a plain fetch is 1 credit, a JavaScript-rendered page is 5, premium proxies are 10, and premium with rendering is 25, which is the ceiling. Residential bandwidth is billed at a flat 25,000 credits per GB, and Browser Sessions add 5 credits a minute on top of bandwidth. Launch at $57 therefore buys about 50,000 rendered pages. Failed requests are not charged, but 404 and 410 responses count as successful. You also get HTML back, so the cleaning and structuring work for an LLM is still yours.

Oxylabs

Web Scraper API: free trial up to 2,000 results, Micro $49 (up to 98,000), Starter $99 (up to 220,000), Advanced $249 (up to 622,500), Business $999 (up to 3,330,000), Custom by quote. Residential proxies are a separate purchase: $30/5GB, $100/20GB, $500/125GB, $2,500/1TB, which is $6.00 down to $2.50 per GB

Where it wins. Enterprise-grade unblocking, a large global proxy network, and dedicated parsers for major targets, plus a free Custom Parser for your own CSS or XPath rules.

What to watch. Two rules move the real bill. First, rates are set by target category, roughly $0.25 to $0.50 per 1,000 for Amazon, $0.50 to $1.00 for Google, $0.70 to $1.15 for other sources and $0.95 to $1.35 with JavaScript rendering, and the headline result count is quoted against the cheapest one. Oxylabs own maximum-results table shows the same free trial buying 2,000 Amazon results but only 769 JavaScript-rendered results from an ordinary site, a 2.6 times spread that carries up the whole ladder. Second, the billing documentation counts any 2xx or 4xx response as a successful result, so a 404 on a dead link or a 403 from a site that blocked you is billed at full rate. Whole-site crawling means buying a second product.

Crawl4AI

Apache-2.0, no license cost. You pay for your own servers, proxies and engineering time. A hosted Cloud API is in closed beta with no public pricing

Where it wins. No vendor bill at all, full control, deep crawling with BFS, DFS and best-first strategies, and output already shaped for RAG ingestion. It is the most popular open-source crawler in the category, with roughly 82,000 GitHub stars.

What to watch. You own the ops: proxy rotation, browser fleet, retries, blocks and upgrades. Free software is not free infrastructure.

Diffbot

Free 10,000 credits a month, Startup $299 (250k credits), Plus $899 (1M credits), Enterprise custom. Overage is $0.001 a credit on Startup and $0.0009 on Plus

Where it wins. A pre-built Knowledge Graph of more than 10 billion entities you can query instead of crawling, and computer-vision extraction that classifies and structures pages with no per-site rules to write.

What to watch. The first paid tier is $299 a month and credits are consumed fast (a Knowledge Graph record costs 25 credits, a data-center proxy request doubles the cost), so for plain RAG ingestion it is expensive and heavier than you need.

ScrapeGraphAI

Free 500 credits, Starter $20 (10k credits), Growth $100 (100k), Pro $500 (750k), Enterprise custom, about 15 percent less billed yearly. The Python library is MIT licensed and free to self-host.

Where it wins. The open-source library (MIT, 30.8k GitHub stars) is a genuine option rather than a demo, it plugs into OpenAI, Groq, Azure, Gemini or a local Ollama model, and the managed API starts at $20 a month, just above the cheapest entry plans in the category.

What to watch. The managed API bills per credit and the rate depends on the endpoint (extract costs 5 credits, stealth adds 4 to 9 depending on the render mode, a crawl adds 2 on top of per-page scrape cost), so cost per page is harder to predict. Failed requests are not charged. Self-hosting means you supply the LLM key and pay model tokens on every page.

Want the full field, including Browserbase? Read the best web scraping API buyer's guide.

Side by side

Browserbase vs ClawEngine, honestly

A fair look at what each does well. Both are capable tools. Here is where they differ.

What matters ClawEngine Browserbase
What you get back Clean markdown or typed JSON, boilerplate stripped A live browser session you drive and read yourself
Billing unit Per page crawled, predictable for read-only volume Per browser hour, plus proxy GB billed separately
Entry price $39 a month, no free plan Free tier, then $20 a month Developer, $99 Startup
Automation code you maintain None; a URL and a schema in one HTTP POST Playwright, Puppeteer or Stagehand scripts you own
Multi-step interaction Not supported; read-only public pages Full control: click, type, navigate, submit forms
Logged-in sessions Not supported by design Supported with your own credentials
Crawling a whole site Seed URL plus scope rules in the same call You write the link-following logic yourself
Best suited for RAG ingestion, research and monitoring at page volume Agents that must act inside a web application

Comparison reflects general, publicly understood positioning. Capabilities change, so check each product for the latest.

Why teams pick ClawEngine

One API that turns any website into clean, LLM-ready data

Reading is not a browser-hour problem

A browser hour is the right unit when a session is long and interactive. It is the wrong unit when you need 50,000 documentation pages read once. Per-page pricing makes a large read-only crawl something you can forecast before you run it.

No automation to keep alive

Driven sessions mean scripts, and scripts break when a source site ships a redesign. Describing the fields you want instead of the clicks that reach them removes the class of maintenance that makes browser automation expensive over time.

Honest about the split

ClawEngine cannot log in, fill a form or walk a checkout, and we will not pretend otherwise. If that is your agent, keep Browserbase or run your own Playwright. Route the reading to a per-page API and the acting to a browser, and both bills get smaller.

People also ask

Browserbase alternatives: the questions buyers ask

What is the best Browserbase alternative?

It depends on the job. For driving a browser through multi-step interactions, the real alternatives are self-hosted Playwright or Puppeteer, or another browser-session host. For reading public pages into structured data, you do not want a browser session at all: ClawEngine, Firecrawl and ScrapingBee return rendered content directly, priced per page rather than per browser hour, which is far cheaper for read-only collection at volume.

What is Browserbase used for?

Browserbase is managed headless browser infrastructure for AI agents and automation. You connect over CDP with Playwright or Puppeteer, or use Stagehand, its open-source framework that adds natural-language control on top of Playwright. It handles browser scaling, session recording, proxies and captcha workflows, so teams building agents that click, type and navigate do not have to run their own browser fleet.

How much does Browserbase cost?

Browserbase publishes a free tier with 3 concurrent browsers and 1 browser hour, a Developer plan at $20 a month with 25 concurrent browsers and 100 browser hours, and a Startup plan at $99 a month with 100 concurrent browsers and 500 browser hours. Overage runs $0.12 and $0.10 per browser hour respectively, with proxies billed separately at $10 to $12 per GB. Scale pricing is custom. Verified August 2026.

Is Browserbase good for web scraping?

It works, but the billing unit fights you. Scraping is mostly reading, and a browser hour buys you a session, not pages. A crawl of 50,000 documentation pages through driven browser sessions means writing and maintaining Playwright scripts, holding sessions open, and paying for browser time plus proxy gigabytes. A per-page crawl and extract API does the same reading for a predictable price and no automation code.

Can a scraping API replace Browserbase for AI agents?

Only for the read half. If your agent researches, ingests documentation or gathers competitor pages, a scraping API replaces Browserbase entirely and costs less. If your agent must sign in, submit a form, or walk a checkout, no read-only API can do that, and Browserbase or your own Playwright deployment remains the right answer. Many teams run both and route by task.

Good questions

Browserbase vs ClawEngine, answered

For the read-only half of agent work, yes, and usually a cheaper one. Research, documentation ingestion, RAG pipelines and competitor monitoring all come down to fetching public pages and structuring them, which ClawEngine does in one call with no automation code. For interactive work it is not an alternative at all, because it does not drive a browser on your behalf.
Plenty of teams do, and the split is usually clean. Anything behind a login or requiring a click goes through a driven browser; anything public and read-only goes through a per-page API. Routing by task rather than forcing everything through one tool is the architecture that keeps both the code and the invoice manageable as an agent grows.
On interaction, on control and on getting started. It can do things a read-only API structurally cannot: authenticate, submit, navigate a stateful flow, and let an agent decide its next click. It also has a free tier and a $20 entry plan against our published $39 floor, and Stagehand is open source and genuinely pleasant if you want natural-language browser control.
Stagehand is Browserbase's open-source framework that layers natural-language actions over Playwright, so you can write an instruction instead of a selector. It is free to use and can run against your own browsers as well as Browserbase infrastructure. It is a control layer, not a hosting plan, so it does not change the browser-hour billing if you run it on Browserbase.

More comparisons

See how ClawEngine compares

vs Firecrawl

Firecrawl alternative

Crawl, render JS and extract typed fields in one call, with compliance-first defaults.

vs Apify

Apify alternative

Skip the actor marketplace: one API returns LLM-ready markdown and typed JSON.

vs Bright Data

Bright Data alternative

LLM-ready output and one simple API, instead of running your own proxy stack.

vs ScrapingBee

ScrapingBee alternative

More than raw HTML: crawl plus typed extraction and LLM-ready markdown in one call.

vs ScraperAPI

ScraperAPI alternative

Past the proxy layer: crawl, render and typed extraction that returns LLM-ready data.

vs ZenRows

ZenRows alternative

Beyond unblocking: crawl, render and typed extraction that returns LLM-ready data.

vs Oxylabs

Oxylabs alternative

Enterprise unblocking is not the same as LLM-ready data. Crawl, render and extract in one call.

vs Crawl4AI

Crawl4AI alternative

Free to license, not free to run. The managed alternative when ops time costs more than the bill.

vs Diffbot

Diffbot alternative

A lighter, lower-cost managed API when you need clean page data for RAG, not a 10-billion-entity Knowledge Graph.

vs ScrapeGraphAI

ScrapeGraphAI alternative

Predictable per-page cost and typed schema extraction, with no LLM key to supply and no token bill per page.

vs Scrapy

Scrapy alternative

Rendering, retries and typed extraction as a managed call, with no spiders or browser fleet to operate.

vs Exa

Exa alternative

For teams who already know which sites they need and want the whole site crawled, not semantically searched.

vs Tavily

Tavily alternative

For teams past the prototype: scoped crawls, page budgets and typed fields pulled from the rendered page.

vs Jina Reader

Jina Reader alternative

Whole-site crawling and typed schema extraction, for teams who have outgrown reading one URL at a time.

vs Zyte

Zyte alternative

Flat monthly plans and typed schema extraction, without per-tier request pricing you cannot forecast.

vs Parallel AI

Parallel AI alternative

Live pages and whole-site crawling, when a cached index and excerpts are not enough.

vs Scrapfly

Scrapfly alternative

Flat per-page pricing with rendering included, instead of a 6x browser multiplier.

vs Olostep

Olostep alternative

A published per-page rate you can forecast, instead of a credit count you learn after the call.

Turn any website into clean, LLM-ready data

One API: a URL in, clean markdown or typed JSON out. ClawEngine crawls, renders JavaScript and extracts typed structured fields in a single call, ready to embed for your RAG pipelines and AI agents.

See pricing

LLM-ready output · one API call · public, permitted data only · robots.txt respected